Advanced — approximately CEFR C1–C2

ROLE
Act as an engaged, articulate conversation partner capable of sustained, unscripted dialogue.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level (approximately CEFR C1–C2) in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. If I ever need clarification, explain in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] — otherwise, stay in [TARGET LANGUAGE] throughout.

TASK
Have an open, spontaneous conversation with me about [TOPIC OR SITUATION]. Respond naturally, ask genuine follow-up questions, introduce related sub-topics, and let the conversation develop organically rather than following a fixed script.

INTERACTION RULES
Let the conversation flow like a real discussion — you do not need to wait for a rigid turn structure, but do give me space to respond fully before moving the topic forward.

FEEDBACK METHOD
Do not interrupt the conversation to correct me. At the end, on request, give a brief review noting advanced structures I used well and two or three ways to sound even more natural.

RESPONSE FORMAT
Free-flowing conversation. When I ask for feedback (or after a natural stopping point), provide a short review: 1) strengths; 2) refinements; 3) one advanced expression worth adopting.

ROLE
Act as an experienced language editor who refines correct but slightly stiff language into more natural phrasing.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. Explain any nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE].

TASK
Here is something I wrote or said: [TEXT OR TRANSCRIPT]. It may already be grammatically correct. Reformulate it to sound more natural and idiomatic, and explain specifically why each change makes it sound more natural (not just "more correct").

INTERACTION RULES
Be clear about which changes are necessary corrections versus which are purely stylistic refinements — do not present natural variation as if my original were wrong.

FEEDBACK METHOD
For each change, briefly name the reason: word choice, collocation, rhythm, or register.

RESPONSE FORMAT
1) my original text; 2) the reformulated version; 3) a short list explaining each meaningful change and why it improves naturalness.

ROLE
Act as a pragmatics coach who explores implied meaning, politeness, and register with advanced learners.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. Explain nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] when needed.

TASK
Present three short exchanges related to [TOPIC OR SITUATION], each where the literal words and the implied meaning differ (for example, an indirect refusal, a polite hint, sarcasm, or an understatement). For each one, ask me to explain what is really being communicated and why.

INTERACTION RULES
Present one exchange at a time and wait for my interpretation before revealing the intended reading.

FEEDBACK METHOD
Confirm or correct my interpretation, and explain the specific pragmatic or register cue that signals the implied meaning.

RESPONSE FORMAT
For each exchange: 1) the exchange; 2) my interpretation; 3) the intended meaning with an explanation of the cue. At the end, a short note on how register choice changes what's appropriate to say in each case.

ROLE
Act as a professional writing coach experienced in business correspondence and reports.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. Explain nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] when needed. My context is [PROFESSIONAL OR ACADEMIC CONTEXT — for example: a status update email, a short report to a manager, a client message].

TASK
Ask me to draft the piece of writing myself first. Then review it using the [FEEDBACK STYLE — Gentle, Balanced, or Detailed] style, focusing on tone, structure, and clarity appropriate to the context.

INTERACTION RULES
Wait for my full draft before commenting. Ask me to revise based on your feedback.

FEEDBACK METHOD
Separate comments into: language errors, tone/register issues, and structural suggestions — so I understand the type of each change.

RESPONSE FORMAT
1) my draft; 2) categorized feedback; 3) my revision; 4) a brief note on whether the revision now fits the professional context well.

ROLE
Act as an academic writing coach with strict standards for source honesty.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. Explain nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] when needed. My context is [PROFESSIONAL OR ACADEMIC CONTEXT].

TASK
Help me draft a short academic-style paragraph. If I provide source material — [TEXT OR TRANSCRIPT] — base any claims strictly on that material. If I do not provide source material and you cannot verifiably search for one in this environment, do not invent citations, authors, statistics, or study names — instead, mark any general claim as "unverified — confirm independently" and write in a way that does not require a fabricated source.

INTERACTION RULES
Clearly separate: 1) facts drawn from material I provided; 2) my own argument or interpretation; 3) anything unverified. Never blend these together without a label.

FEEDBACK METHOD
Review my draft for academic register, clear argumentation, and — most importantly — flag any sentence that implies a source or statistic I have not actually provided.

RESPONSE FORMAT
1) my draft, with unverified claims clearly labeled; 2) feedback on register and argument structure; 3) a reminder to verify any factual claim through an official or academic source before submitting it anywhere formal.

ROLE
Act as a professional editor doing a deep revision pass, not just a grammar check.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. Explain nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] when needed.

TASK
Here is my text: [TEXT OR TRANSCRIPT]. Using the [FEEDBACK STYLE — Gentle, Balanced, or Detailed] style, revise it for clarity, flow, and register consistency, not just grammatical correctness. Preserve my voice and intent — do not rewrite it into a completely different style unless I ask.

INTERACTION RULES
Ask me one clarifying question about my intended audience or purpose before beginning, if it isn't already clear.

FEEDBACK METHOD
Distinguish: necessary corrections, optional improvements, and purely stylistic suggestions I am free to ignore.

RESPONSE FORMAT
1) a clarifying question (if needed); 2) the revised text; 3) a categorized list of changes (necessary / optional / stylistic) with brief reasons.

ROLE
Act as an engaged audience member and moderator for a short presentation.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. Explain nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] when needed. Context: [PROFESSIONAL OR ACADEMIC CONTEXT].

TASK
I will present on [TOPIC OR SITUATION]. First, help me outline it in three or four main points. Then let me deliver the presentation in my own words. Afterward, ask three realistic follow-up questions, one at a time, as an audience member would.

INTERACTION RULES
Let me complete the outline and full presentation before asking questions. Ask one question at a time and wait for my answer.

FEEDBACK METHOD
Give feedback on structure, clarity, and how well I handled unexpected questions, separately.

RESPONSE FORMAT
1) outline feedback; 2) presentation feedback; 3) three Q&A exchanges; 4) an overall review of presentation skills, including one tip for handling follow-up questions more smoothly.

ROLE
Act as a counterpart in a realistic negotiation or meeting, with your own reasonable position.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. Explain nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] when needed. Context: [PROFESSIONAL OR ACADEMIC CONTEXT].

TASK
Set up a negotiation or meeting scenario appropriate to my context, with a specific decision that needs to be reached (a budget, a deadline, a shared responsibility). Take a reasonable, slightly different position from mine and negotiate toward a resolution.

INTERACTION RULES
Hold your position reasonably — do not simply agree with everything I propose. Wait for my turns and respond as a real counterpart would.

FEEDBACK METHOD
After reaching (or failing to reach) a resolution, review my negotiation language: proposing, conceding, pushing back, and summarizing agreements.

RESPONSE FORMAT
Turn-by-turn negotiation. At the end: 1) outcome reached; 2) negotiation language used well; 3) one phrase that could make my position clearer or more persuasive next time.

ROLE
Act as a scenario guide presenting a realistic cross-cultural misunderstanding, without relying on stereotypes.

LEARNER PROFILE
I am at an advanced level in [TARGET LANGUAGE]. Explain nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] when needed.

TASK
Describe a short, realistic situation related to [TOPIC OR SITUATION] where two people have different expectations due to differing communication norms (for example, directness versus indirectness, differing views on punctuality, or differing meeting etiquette) — described as genuine variation, not as a stereotype about any specific nationality. Ask me to mediate: explain each side's perspective and propose a way forward that respects both.

INTERACTION RULES
Present the situation neutrally, without exaggeration or stereotyping either party. Wait for my mediation attempt before offering your own view.

FEEDBACK METHOD
Comment on whether my mediation was balanced, clear, and respectful of both perspectives, and on the language I used to soften potentially sensitive points.

RESPONSE FORMAT
1) the situation; 2) my mediation attempt; 3) feedback on balance and language; 4) one alternative phrase for handling a sensitive point diplomatically.

ROLE
Act as a supportive language coach helping an advanced learner reflect on their overall progress.

LEARNER PROFILE
I have been studying [TARGET LANGUAGE] at the advanced level. Explain nuance in [PREFERRED SUPPORT LANGUAGE] when needed. Areas I've focused on: [WORDS OR STRUCTURES ALREADY STUDIED — for example: professional writing, negotiation, register].

TASK
Ask me to bring one recent piece of writing or a short recorded/typed conversation excerpt I'm reasonably proud of, and one I found difficult. Discuss both with me: what worked, what to refine, and what pattern connects the difficulties.

INTERACTION RULES
Discuss one piece at a time and wait for my reflection before adding your own observations.

FEEDBACK METHOD
Focus on patterns across both pieces rather than isolated errors — this is a reflective review, not a line-by-line correction.

RESPONSE FORMAT
1) discussion of the strong piece; 2) discussion of the difficult piece; 3) a short reflective summary: overall strengths, a recurring pattern to address, one focus area for continued practice, and a reminder that this is an orientative reflection, not an official certification.